PolkaGate: One-Year Retroactive Funding Proposal (Oct. 2023 - Oct. 2024)

Medium Spender
22d ago
11 Comments
Deciding
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
64,311DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
0
Tally
17.6%Aye
82.4%Nay
Aye
6.75MDOT
Nay
31.58MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.09%)
1.4MDOT
Issuance
1.51BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments

Have you considered investing in a proper UI redesign? I've tried using the extension for a bit and it seems quite robust, but the user-experience based on design is just really subpar. It's clearly been both designed and developed by a team of back-end developers which shows in good functionality but poor UX..

image.png

The UI is crowded, has inconsistent to unreadable font sizing and font-family usage, inconsistent use of icons / CTA, headers inside of headers inside of headers (see pool staking page) and no clear hierarchy.

image.png

You've clearly put effort into the extension, but for the community to pay over $250k is tough with sleek alternatives like Nova wallet and Talisman. Personally if I were to introduce a new user to the Polkadot ecosystem I would hesitate to show them PolkaGate. I don't want to be overly harsh or mean but in all honesty the extension looks more like a student's hobby project than something which over $250.000 has been invested into which sours the proposal. I don't think in it's current form PolkaGate has a spot among the competition or can provide much added value to the ecosystem.

Reply
Up

lol he won't answer the first basic question he was asked... nay

Reply
Up

Dear @Polkagate,

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is NAY. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Supporters acknowledged PolkaGate’s active contributions to the ecosystem and its tools' benefits, including multi-chain support. However, concerns were raised about the request being made in DOT instead of stable coins and the need for further UI improvements. Abstentions reflected a cautious stance, with some recognizing PolkaGate’s value but suggesting enhancements before future funding requests.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up

Hello Polkagate Team!

I'm writing this comment on behalf of the Polkadot Hungary DAO. We have voted Nay on this proposal. You can find the details of our voting process on our Notion page (link).

First of all, we'd like to thank you for the work on Polkagate wallet. We appreciate the features that only PolkaGate offers, incl setting, managing and signing with different proxy accounts, social recovery, built-in governance interface, etc.

While we support Polkagate wallet, we have made our decision based on the following thoughts:

  • Our suggestion would be to ask for stablecoins instead of DOT.
  • The UX-UI of the wallet has some major flaws, which make it less pleasing to users (which shows in the numbers as well: according to Chrome Webstore only 2000 user downloaded Polkagate). We recommend to plan a major update in this area, make the UI less crowded, consistent layout all around. This is how other wallets also stand out, and since this is the first experience users have, we find it highly important.
  • We also would like to see better user statistics on Polkagate wallet usage as the information provided in the proposal are far from satisfying.
Reply
Up

I am sorry, I forget to add the link to your proposal's evaluation page. Here you can see how we voted on your proposal.

Reply
Up