Argentinos Juniors Fantasy Opportunity

Medium Spender
8d ago
7 Comments
Deciding
  • Content
  • AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
440KUSDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
0
Tally
0%Aye
100%Nay
Aye
28.44DOT
Nay
37.75MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.00%)
13.65KDOT
Issuance
1.51BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
  • Call
  • Metadata
  • Timeline3
  • Votes Bubble
  • Statistics
Comments

Hi,
It's a Marketing request so please use the new Marketing Bounty, so it's a clear NAY for this lonely proposal.

NAY in the Marketing Bounty too. We need to stop these no ROI football Marketing campaigns, everyone will want to have something for his local club. Not really serious unfortunately.

But feel free to try with the Marketing Bounty.

Reply
Up

This is unlikely to make a measurable impact, and is far too pricey for a niche market experiment (especially for a team I hadn't even heard of before and I played soccer 10+ years here in the US on a state ODP team...). Voting nay but wish you the best of luck.

Reply
Up

Hello and thank you for the referendum, it’s always amazing to see new participants engage with OpenGov and Polkadot.

We have decided to vote against this proposal due to some design and planning problems which we would like to see solved. We are going to list them so that whatever amends and resubmissions take into account these issues.

First the positives. We see Argentina as one of the regions with more potential adoption as confirmed by many of the on-chain analytics companies. It’s currently not showing at the top of the main adoption countries but we are aware that these numbers don’t reflect the full picture either as crypto is heavily used in said region.

First, we would like to point out the obvious fact of “where and when it will be deployed”. Based on the written and video information, we know that the team plans to deploy on “smart contracts” and on Polkadot’s Assethub. For the time being, AssetHub doesn’t support smart contracts so it would only be limited to holding NFTs thus making it difficult for such a Fantasy team to be built on top of it (Assethub lacks programmability for now). So other questions become relevant, if this is an EVM product like the previous development at: https://fantasy.belgrano.com.ar/ also developed by Studio 54, a clarification as to whether they will wait for the evolution of Assethub into “Plaza” (Assethub smart contract functionality) or whether it will be deployed on another EVM chain or smart contract chain like Pop or Moonbeam. Alternatively, an NFT-only approach (as availability only) will be tried while all execution happens on web2 tools. These questions seem relevant at this stage.

Second, the functionality of a fantasy team within a single team is brand new to us. Previously, we only were aware of multiple teams fantasy sports so this 1 team fantasy team is quite a brand new approach. Nothing bad per se, but certainly limiting to what the fantasy world can offer. So in this case we are limited by the intersection of the club reach and the fantasy users. Belgrano seems bigger in size https://x.com/Belgrano 310k on X 433k on Instagram and the fantasy application remains on low traffic. So we would also like to see a plan to have a large impact on such built applications if the Polkadot treasury is going to fund it.

Reply
Up