Subscan Q3/Q4 2024 Funding Proposal: Basic service fee & Development cost for the Polkadot, Westend, and Rococo Ecosystems)

Medium Spender
17d ago
9 Comments
Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
163.51KUSDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
0
Tally
99.9%Aye
0.1%Nay
Aye
26.45MDOT
Nay
29.65KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support(0.33%)
4.96MDOT
Issuance
1.52BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

It would be better to remove these ads completely

Edited

Reply
Up

Helixstreet is proud to be able to vote (including with its entrusted votes) in favor of the proposal. Subscan is a pillar of the ecosystem.

Reply
Up

Dear @SUBSCAN ,

Thank you for your proposal. Our vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Medium Spender track requires a 50% quorum and simple majority according to our voting policy. This proposal has received seven aye and one nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The referendum received strong support, with most members emphasising Subscan’s role as critical infrastructure for Polkadot and recognising its high value to users. However, some concerns were raised about its closed-source nature and the advertisement of competing ecosystems like Solana on its homepage. One member voted nay to signal dissatisfaction, and another abstained due to mixed opinions, while still acknowledging Subscan's importance. Overall, the proposal was widely supported for its indispensable contributions to the ecosystem.

The full discussion, along with individual members' votes and comments, can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Reply
Up