- Referenda/
- Small Spender/
- #1466/
Polkadot Cloud Website Development (Phase 1: Q2 2025)
- 0.0%
- 0.0%
- 0.0%
Threshold
I like the proposal 👍 and think it is important to have. I think it should be open source though (or if build in framer as extendible as possible) so other devs can work on it too. afaik polkadot.com is closed source still.
Awesome to see this! I like the conceptual division between polkadot.com for everyone and polkadot.cloud for enterprise.
What will the website be built with? React is mentioned in the doc but just as code refinement? This HAS to be open source (also not mentioned in the doc) and built with a tool that'll make it easy to maintain, something like NextJS which almost every web developer uses nowadays.
Is it possible to know in advance the cost of the phase 2 if phase 1 were to be approved?
We have voted AYE in the meantime as we support the idea of a generalized entry point for developers and users alike.
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received nine aye and zero nay votes from ten current members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The voters expressed strong support for the proposal, highlighting the benefits of establishing a dedicated website for the Polkadot Cloud. They appreciated the unique perspective and design that could enhance Polkadot's image and traction. Many emphasized the importance of user-focused content and a competitive online presence. While one voter suggested that a more technically-oriented approach could strengthen the proposal, they still recognized the value of the current initiative and the contributions of the designer involved. Overall, the sentiment was overwhelmingly positive.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
DISCLAIMER: The proposer, being one of our members, did not vote on this proposal.
Edited
Hi, Your feedback has been brought back to our members, and our moderator has asked each member to revisit both the comments and proposal. Wish you the best of luck.
What I really like about this is that we need a "go to" place for a digestible messages on Hub and Cloud, which will help everyone in the Polkadot ecosystem to have a common message on what these products are. As someone who is bringing Web3 to Web2, we need this!
This should be on the polkadot website, not a separate page / site with the "official name". Nay
Please note: This proposal was submitted via my governance proxy account, linked to my verified stash/identity for Flez (1haHsRuCUCkbkPRmSrnfP8ps6cTaR2b5JCU5uNPUbxsVPbf), as Polkadot.js currently lacks Ledger signing support for sub-identities.