Funding for Public RPC Providers via Bounty 31

Medium Spender
20d ago
3 Comments
Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
39,511DOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation4d
Attempts
0
Tally
100%Aye
0%Nay
Aye
26.44MDOT
Nay
8.4KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.31%
4.82MDOT
Issuance
1.54BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

helixstreet has cast its votes in favor of this proposal with utmost conviction and pride, recognizing a concurrent, albeit minor, self-interest.

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten members, with one member abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The majority of voters expressed support for funding RPC Providers, praising the public tender model for service provision. Overall, the proposal was viewed positively, though concerns about currency stability were noted.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Edited

Reply
Up