Referendum #1487

Paseo - Developer Testnet Bounty Top-up Request

Big Spender
1mo ago
7 Comments
Executed
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
155.93KDOT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation7d
Attempts
1
Tally
100%Aye
51.9%Threshold
0%Nay
Aye
56.55MDOT
Nay
6.02KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support1.01%
15.6MDOT
Issuance
1.55BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline6
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Paseo has been essential for our launch of Incognitee privacy sidechain for Polkadot enabling private transfers of DOT and other Asset Hub assets. The support by the team was great and Paseo has served as stable staging deployment for us.
Integrations like snowbridge are very valuable and would be very hard to setup and maintain for each project by themselves.

Edited

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received six aye and zero nay votes from ten members, with three members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

While several participants voiced strong support, emphasizing its importance for Polkadot's infrastructure and the necessity of maintaining multiple testnets, others abstained due to concerns over the proposal's high cost. Some voters highlighted the value of funding such initiatives, yet questioned financial strategies, including potential issues with treasury stability after substantial bounties. Overall, the discussion reflected a balance between support and caution regarding funding methodologies.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO

Edited

Reply
Up

Big shoutout to the team! Their quick guidance and support were instrumental in launching the SoftLaw
Testnet
.

Edited

Reply
Up