Suprime - Fully Decentralized Accelerator

TimedOut
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
210KDOT
Tally
2.9%Aye
100.0%Threshold
97.1%Nay
Aye
โ‰ˆ1.2MDOT
Nay
โ‰ˆ40.9MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

Threshold

Support0.02%
โ‰ˆ318.68KDOT
Issuance
โ‰ˆ1.56BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Call
Metadata
Timeline2
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

`All the technical components are built there and operational, deployed on Sepolia (you can give it a try https://test.suprime.io/)

Once we secure strategic partnerships and the technical audit is done, we're ready to deploy it to Polkadot ecosystem`

Sorry, but where do you want to deploy your solution?
"Polkadot ecosystem" means nothing, your product seems to be an EVM one, so please precise where you expect to deploy your product? Which chain?

Thx in advance.

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received zero aye and five nay votes from nine available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters expressed skepticism about the proposal, noting it seemed premature to secure funding. They emphasized the need for proposers to gain a deeper understanding of the Polkadot ecosystem and to engage with the community for feedback. Concerns were raised regarding the lack of direct benefits to Polkadot, with several voters highlighting the importance of building a track record through smaller initiatives before making larger requests. Overall, there was a call for more clarity on how the proposal would positively impact the network.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

๐Ÿ“… Book Office Hours
๐Ÿ’ฌ Public Telegram
๐ŸŒ๏ธ Web
๐Ÿฆ Twitter
๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Delegate

Reply
Up