Request to develop a Polkadot registrar of projects.

TimedOut
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
3,000DOT
Tally
25.9%Aye
100.0%Threshold
74.1%Nay
Aye
โ‰ˆ7.2MDOT
Nay
โ‰ˆ20.6MDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.08%
โ‰ˆ1.32MDOT
Issuance
โ‰ˆ1.57BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Calls
Check how referenda works here.
Call
Metadata
Timeline2
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Good morning, guys. Happy to see people coming to the treasury, not asking for big chunks. Your proposal is humble, but I still have some questions that more people might know the answers to. ๐Ÿ˜Š

Are there any plans to maintain the project after these two months? Will you come to the treasury again for that?

How is your project different from platforms like https://polkaproject.com/, https://polkadotecosystem.com/, or even Polkadot.com (they have listed projects on the webpage).

What do you mean by the registrar of Polkadot Projects seeking support? Will there be a listing only of projects that need something?

Thank you for the answers ๐Ÿซก

Reply
Up

can you share a link to test "Fund the World", please

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY.

The Small Spender track requires 50% participation and simple majority of non-abstain voters according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received one aye and four nay votes from ten available members, with three members abstaining. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters expressed mixed opinions on the referendum, with some supporting the initiative while others abstained or opposed it. Supporters highlighted the potential for integrating alumni as developers and enhancing donor interfaces, emphasizing the need for anonymity features. Conversely, several voters questioned the value of the proposed project, citing existing alternatives and concerns about user adoption without a user-friendly website. Some abstained, indicating they were working on similar projects or needed more information before making a decision. Overall, there was a call for clearer execution strategies and evidence of traction.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

๐Ÿ“… Book Office Hours
๐Ÿ’ฌ Public Telegram
๐ŸŒ๏ธ Web
๐Ÿฆ Twitter
๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Delegate

Reply
Up