Replace and Recover Failed Treasury Spend

Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
312.5KUSDC
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
4d
Attempts
0
Tally
99.9%Aye
0.1%Nay
Aye
14.15MDOT
Nay
20.5KDOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.23%
3.74MDOT
Issuance
1.59BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Actions
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Statistics
Comments

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum (at least 5 aye votes) and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received five aye and zero nay votes from ten available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

The voters expressed unanimous support by affirming that the proposal justified fulfilling the previously approved treasury payment despite technical setbacks. They argued that rectifying the failed asset transfer was necessary to honor commitments made in earlier proposals. The comments highlighted that even though administrative errors led to an unsuccessful payment execution, addressing the issue was fair and essential to uphold past approvals. The decision was driven by a shared belief in the importance of meeting contractual obligations and recovering funds, ensuring that the work previously endorsed was appropriately compensated despite the encountered challenges.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up