Subscan Q4 2024 – Q2 2025 Funding Proposal: Basic Service Fee & Development Cost for the Polkadot and Westend Ecosystems

Deciding
Content
AI Summary
Reply
Up
Share
Request
184.67KUSDT
Status
Decision28d
Confirmation
4d
Attempts
0
Tally
100%Aye
0%Nay
Aye
6.82MDOT
Nay
20DOT
  • 0.0%
  • 0.0%

    Threshold

  • 0.0%
Support
0.08%
1.3MDOT
Issuance
1.6BDOT
Votes
Nested
Flattened
Actions
Or do delegation here, check wiki.
Call
Metadata
Timeline3
Votes Bubble
Curves
Statistics
Comments

One of the most important tools in the ecosystem is requesting significantly less funding than other simpler and less-used tools. That shows me how serious you are. Strong AYE.

Reply
Up

Hi,

Just for the record, some readers were confused about the use of "parachains" to talk about "system chains".

2025 Q1–Q2 Basic Service Fee — Ensuring uninterrupted, high-quality operations of Subscan across the Polkadot, Westend, and **associated parachain networks.**

It would be maybe more appropriate to clarify by using "system chains".
"Parachains" is usually used for commercial chains (Hydration, Bifrost, Moonbeam...) but not the system chains (even if a system chain is also a parachain).

Just a detail here :)

Reply
Up

Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.

The Medium Spender track requires 50% quorum (at least 4 aye votes) and simple majority of non-abstain votes according to our voting policy v0.2, and any referendum in which the majority of members vote abstain receives an abstain vote. This proposal has received four aye and zero nay votes from eight available members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Voters supported the funding proposal with a clear consensus that Subscan remained indispensable to the Polkadot ecosystem. One voter clarified their stance after a correction, aligning with previous comments in favor of Subscan’s critical role, while another emphasized its essential nature in maintaining reliable ecosystem services. They agreed with the proposal’s rationale to secure continued operational and developmental support, which aimed to cover necessary costs across multiple networks and enhance overall performance. Their votes reflected confidence in Subscan’s ability to provide transparent, accurate data, thereby reinforcing its position as a fundamental component of the ecosystem’s infrastructure.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort IV Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Reply
Up

Saxemberg has voted AYE on the Polkadot referendum 1727 Subscan Q4 2024 – Q2 2025 Funding Proposal: Basic Service Fee & Development Cost for the Polkadot and Westend Ecosystems. Core infrastructure is heavily supported.
This referendum is eligible for vote overrule:
https://voting.opensquare.io/space/the-sax-guild/proposal/QmPi7pcE4RfmhZ92oQySJdys4zLugy3qdw4ta65jKRq9YU

Reply
Up