At the moment no child bounties have been granted.
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/bounties/62
However it is expected to have the following payments: the bounty members have done Administrative Work, a Sample Case of a Crypto Foundation, a 14 page document outlining the PCF work and interactions “Polkadot Community Foundation” and a IP Strategy Pack. This should total of ca. CHF 26k (ca. USD $33k) or 10’904 DOT, plus 2’548 DOT vested over 6 months (total 13’452 DOT).
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-legal-bounty-update/15944
At the moment that our discussion began
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/posts/425
no activity was recorded. According to the discussion and private communications it was expected that the bounty would ramp up activity or wind down the bounty. No further replies from the bounty have been published after that.
It remains to be seen if significant activity can be achieved with the remainder of funds with the current approach.
As far as we can tell, onboarded teams cannot be verified due to privacy, confidentiality concerns as well as light research about people and teams who might use the bounty.
As we originally argued, teams seem to seek their own legal support independently and the Legal Bounty doesn’t seem to have found a niche to justify its continuation.
For those reasons we believe it is better to close the bounty and to return the funds to the treasury.
At the moment no child bounties have been granted.
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/bounties/62
However it is expected to have the following payments: the bounty members have done Administrative Work, a Sample Case of a Crypto Foundation, a 14 page document outlining the PCF work and interactions “Polkadot Community Foundation” and a IP Strategy Pack. This should total of ca. CHF 26k (ca. USD $33k) or 10’904 DOT, plus 2’548 DOT vested over 6 months (total 13’452 DOT).
https://forum.polkadot.network/t/polkadot-legal-bounty-update/15944
At the moment that our discussion began
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/posts/425
no activity was recorded. According to the discussion and private communications it was expected that the bounty would ramp up activity or wind down the bounty. No further replies from the bounty have been published after that.
It remains to be seen if significant activity can be achieved with the remainder of funds with the current approach.
As far as we can tell, onboarded teams cannot be verified due to privacy, confidentiality concerns as well as light research about people and teams who might use the bounty.
As we originally argued, teams seem to seek their own legal support independently and the Legal Bounty doesn’t seem to have found a niche to justify its continuation.
For those reasons we believe it is better to close the bounty and to return the funds to the treasury.