Polkadot System Parachain Collators - Tips - Referenda #151 failed to execute

Dear Polkadot community,

Thank you all for your support and votes on the approved Referenda 151. I want to address an oversight regarding the multiple batch calls assigned to the "big_tipper" track, where I assumed individual limits were checked relative to the track limits. However, the total spending of the call is checked relative to the track limits. As the result, the referenda failed to execute.

Due to my oversight, the previous Referenda was submitted under the "Big tipper" track instead of "small_spender." To rectify this, I am resubmitting the proposal to the correct track. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Polkadot community,

Collators on System Parachains are provided with minimal rewards for block production and small incentives in terms of transaction fees. This reduces incentives for Collators to act in a favorable manner and they may also be inclined to under-resourcing their hosts to save costs. Collators should receive funding for the provision of their services. Ultimately, this should be provided by the chain in a preferably sustainable manner. Implementation of such a system is a long-term solution. In the medium term, funding for collators can be provided by the respective Treasuries in the form of a bounty. This allows funding to be pre-allocated and independently managed.

Based on Kusama System Parachains Collator Bounty, and RFC-0007: System Collator Selection, this proposal is a short-term solution aiming to post-pay monthly operating costs of service providers until a more suitable solution (Bounty) is established.

Full Proposal

The proposal aims to secure 6,075.79 DOT for Collators on the Polkadot System Parachains network for services delivered for the period of 2 months - 08-09/2023.

This discussion will be open for a period of one week before submitting the proposal onchain. We encourage the Polkadot community to review this proposal and provide any feedback or suggestions.

Thank you!

*Update 11/09: Parity Collators excluded from the funding proposal. Updated the document with new verified identities.

Hello little friend! So, there's this group called Polkadot, and they had a problem with something called Referenda 151. The person who made it made a mistake and put it in the wrong place. Now, they're fixing it and putting it in the right place.

Also, there's another thing happening in Polkadot. The people who help make the system work, called Collators, don't get enough rewards. So, someone came up with a plan to give them more money for their work. They want to give them 6,075.79 DOT for two months of work. They're asking everyone in the Polkadot group to look at the plan and give their thoughts.

And guess what? They made a change on 11/09, they won't give money to Parity Collators. They also updated the document with new information.

Source

Dear Polkadot community,

Thank you all for your support and votes on the approved Referenda 151. I want to address an oversight regarding the multiple batch calls assigned to the "big_tipper" track, where I assumed individual limits were checked relative to the track limits. However, the total spending of the call is checked relative to the track limits. As the result, the referenda failed to execute.

Due to my oversight, the previous Referenda was submitted under the "Big tipper" track instead of "small_spender." To rectify this, I am resubmitting the proposal to the correct track. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Polkadot community,

Collators on System Parachains are provided with minimal rewards for block production and small incentives in terms of transaction fees. This reduces incentives for Collators to act in a favorable manner and they may also be inclined to under-resourcing their hosts to save costs. Collators should receive funding for the provision of their services. Ultimately, this should be provided by the chain in a preferably sustainable manner. Implementation of such a system is a long-term solution. In the medium term, funding for collators can be provided by the respective Treasuries in the form of a bounty. This allows funding to be pre-allocated and independently managed.

Based on Kusama System Parachains Collator Bounty, and RFC-0007: System Collator Selection, this proposal is a short-term solution aiming to post-pay monthly operating costs of service providers until a more suitable solution (Bounty) is established.

Full Proposal

The proposal aims to secure 6,075.79 DOT for Collators on the Polkadot System Parachains network for services delivered for the period of 2 months - 08-09/2023.

This discussion will be open for a period of one week before submitting the proposal onchain. We encourage the Polkadot community to review this proposal and provide any feedback or suggestions.

Thank you!

*Update 11/09: Parity Collators excluded from the funding proposal. Updated the document with new verified identities.