Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

small_tipper

Nixon Javier, a content creator and ambassador for Polkadot, is facing a challenge that may affect his ability to continue creating educational content about cryptocurrencies and the Polkadot ecosystem. His computer, which he uses to make tutorial videos and articles, is about to fail. He is asking the Polkadot community for support to buy a new computer so he can keep making quality content to help people learn about and use Polkadot. He needs 240 DOT to buy a new computer and promises to keep helping the community understand and use Polkadot. Nixon shares his YouTube videos and social media links for people to see his work.

Rejected

Proposal for Ensuring Continuity in Creating Content about Polkadot - VOTE NAY. THE PREIMAGE PROPOSAL IS PULLED

Executed

SmallTipper

- **Tip Request for Expert Report**: A request has been made to tip [@OnlyDeFiGuy](https://polkadot.polkassembly.io/user/OnlyDeFiGuy) for his expert report on HydraDX's referendum [#561](https://polkadot.subsquare.io/referenda/referendum/561).
- **Report Details**: The report can be found [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rrx1DX_HURVAFHspC2hSEXqxyTKpsqeDqUabKfHtt_o/edit?usp=sharing) and is described as informative and unbiased, detailing both the pros and cons of the proposal.
- **Controversy and Discussion**: There was some controversy on X, but the resulting discussion is considered valuable.
- **Tip Amount**: The requested tip is 42 DOT, approximately $375 based on today's rate ($8.94) and EMA7/EMA30 ($8.78/$9.1).
- **Purpose of Tip**: The tip is seen as a symbolic compensation for the expert's efforts and to encourage more expert reports on proposals.
- **Author's Note**: The author, kukabi | Helikon, mentions removing their vote due to delegation.

WHO: OnlyDeFiGuy

WHAT: Expert report on HydraDX's referendum #561

PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: Tip request of 42 DOT, roughly $375 at today's rate, as a symbolic compensation for his efforts.

Tip Request for @OnlyDeFiGuy for the Expert Report on Referendum #561

### Summary
- **Event**: Block & Wine Vienna Meetup on February 6, 2024
- **Presenter**: Polkalytics
- **Content**: 30-minute presentation on Polkadot fundamentals, latest developments, and parachains
- **Audience**: ~50 people unfamiliar with Polkadot
- **Output**: Recorded presentation with subtitles on YouTube
- **Cost**: 1,260 EUR (1,050 EUR + VAT) for preparation and video editing
- **About Polkalytics**: Data-driven reporting and consulting for Polkadot, founded by Tommi Enenkel (Alice und Bob)

WHO: Polkalytics

WHAT: Retroactive proposal for attendance, presentation, and content production for the Block & Wine Vienna Meetup on the 6th of February 2024.

PRICE: 1,260 EUR (1,050 EUR + VAT)

TIMEFRAME: Service rendered before the contract with the W3F came into effect.

Tip for Polkadot Presentation at Vienna Crypto Meetup

Tip for Adam Steeber + Kusamarian concerning #514 Conor Daly - 2024 Indianapolis 500 Sponsorship

Pitcoin, a Polkadot senior ambassador and Astar Network Ecosystem Agent, has proposed a request for retroactive funding for 14 pieces of content related to the Polkadot ecosystem. The requested amount is 200 DOT. The content includes articles and threads on various topics such as Mandala Chain, Polkadot Voting Collectives, Decentralized Grants W3F, and more. The goal is to promote communication and content creation about Polkadot and Kusama in a more digestible manner for users within and outside the Polkadot ecosystem. The funds will be managed by Marco Antonio Guimarães da Rocha, who can be contacted through various platforms.

Retroactive Small Tips for Content (February)

### Summary of Proposal

- **Issue**: A bug caused pool rewards to be sent to the wrong accounts during the unbonding process.
- **Bug Fix**: The bug was fixed in the latest runtime upgrade.
- **Affected Members**: 50 pool members did not receive their rewards.
- **Python Script**: A script was used to identify the affected accounts and the missing rewards.
- **Results**: The findings are available in a shared file for cross-checking.
- **Double Spend**: The rewards were already claimed by pool owners, but contacting them to return the rewards would be difficult.
- **Proposal**: The proposal suggests reimbursing the affected pool members directly.
- **Community Approval**: The community's approval is requested for this proposal.

Polkadot proposes to reimburse 50 pool members for rewards they didn't receive due to a bug in the system. The affected accounts and the rewards they didn't receive were identified using a Python script. The proposal is a double spend and will cost a small amount. The community's approval is sought.

Reimbursement for lost pool rewards

Erick is a Senior Ambassador of Polkadot. In February, he participated in a panel on blockchains and communities at the Nerdconf 6th edition event in Mexico. He represented Polkadot and the Polkadot community with enthusiasm. The event details and photos can be found in the provided links. Erick is requesting a small tip of 90 DOT and would like feedback from the community about their work in Mexico.

WHO: Erick, Senior Ambassador of Polkadot.
WHAT: Requesting a small tipper of approximately 90 DOT and feedback from the community about the work done in Mexico.
PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: Not specified.

Representation of Polkadot at the NERDCONF 6th Edition event in Mexico City at the BBVA Tower.

**Common-Good Initiative Summary**

- **Refunds**: Offers to refund decision deposits and submission deposits on Polkadot and Collectives.
- **Validator Support**: Helps validators from the 1KV program with their payouts.
- **Funding**: Currently funded by the initiator at a cost of 10-15 DOT per month.
- **Expansion**: Plans to expand support from 10 to 50 validators.
- **Budget**: Estimated full capacity cost is 50 DOT per month.
- **Payout Address**: Uses the address `153NYWsbLZmFRZbuUk1sYoJPkYXQTiR3Efa5u5CohWQBKKr2` for funding.
- **Kusama Service**: Similar service on Kusama is well-subscribed and funded by on-chain experiments.
- **Referendum**: Seeks 250 DOT for the initiative.

WHO: Will, a member of the Polkadot community.

WHAT: Refund decision and submission deposits on Polkadot and Collectives, help validators with their payouts.

PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: Currently funded by Will at a cost of 10-15 DOT/month. Will intends to expand the number of validators supported by the payout bot from \~10 to 50 in the first tranche, which would amount to 50 DOT/month at full capacity. Will would seek top-ups with an 8-week notice for continuity of service. This referendum seeks 250 DOT issued to the payee `153NYWsbLZmFRZbuUk1sYoJPkYXQTiR3Efa5u5CohWQBKKr2`.

Tip for Common Good Referendum Deposit Clean-up and Validator Payout Bot

### Summary

- **Developer**: pandres95
- **Date**: 15/02/2024
- **Amount Requested**: 217.2437202987 DOT
- **Project**: Matrix Bot for Polkadot Fellowship
- **Purpose**: Announces ongoing referenda related to RFCs weekly
- **Features**: 
  - Reduces noise and bias
  - Provides links to proposals and RFC pull requests
- **Future Plans**:
  - Decentralize the bot
  - Update voting counts
  - Summarize RFCs using ML
  - Open discussion threads
  - Personalized digests
  - Expand to more bots and channels

WHO: `12gMhxHw8QjEwLQvnqsmMVY1z5gFa54vND74aMUbhhwN6mJR`

WHAT: Requesting `$1,600` (@ `7.365` DOT / EMA7) as retroactive for 32 hours of work on a Matrix Bot that announces weekly ongoing referenda related to RFCs in the Polkadot Fellowship.

PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: `$1,600` / N/A / N/A

Retroactive funding for developing the RFCs Referenda Bot

WHO: Not specified
WHAT: Promote targeted implementation of a technical application for process success and gather means to implement the instrument
PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: Not specified

Formation of new space. Eliminate blockage. Developed for peace!

- The ranked collective is a type of group that helps manage a committee.
- A feature was added to allow a member to exchange their account with another one.
- This is helpful for members who want to swap their accounts.
- The changes were made to a project called Polkadot SDK.
- The work included making the new feature, testing it, and measuring how well it works.
- The person is asking for a small tip as a reward for their effort.

WHO: The proposer
WHAT: Added a dispatchable to ranked collective for exchanging a member with an Exchange Origin
PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: Small tip request

Retroactive tip for work done on exchanging a member in the ranked collective

Pitcoin, a Polkadot senior ambassador and Astar Network Ecosystem Agent, is requesting retroactive funds for 17 content pieces produced in the last three months. They have been involved with the Polkadot ecosystem since 2021 and have created content for the community. The requested amount is 200 DOT, and the funds will be used to support their continued content creation and promotion of Polkadot and Kusama. Pitcoin's work includes articles, threads, and social media engagement, aiming to educate and share news about the technical aspects of these projects in a more digestible manner.

Small Tips for Retroactive Content

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

big_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Referenda Small Tipper

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

[30] Origin: SmallTipper