Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

wish_for_change

- **Current Spending Periods**: Currently set at 24 days, these periods cause delays in funding.
- **Referendum Process**: It takes up to 28 days for a referendum to pass.
- **Confirmation Time**: An additional 7 days are needed for confirmation.
- **Cumulative Delay**: If confirmation ends on the first day of a new spending period, another 24 days are required, totaling up to 2 months.
- **Arbitrary Duration**: The 24-day period is considered arbitrary and problematic.
- **Proposal for Change**: Suggest reducing the spending period to the shortest possible time, ideally one day or one week if technically feasible.
- **Purpose of Change**: The shorter the period, the less uncertainty and quicker the funding process.

Executed

Proposal: **Reduce spending period to shortest possible time, ideally 1 day, or max 1 week, to avoid 2-month wait for funds.** Current 24-day period causes unnecessary uncertainty. Timeframe/resources not specified.

Reducing duration of spending periods

### Polkadot EVM Collective

- **Purpose**: Focuses on Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) within the Polkadot ecosystem.
- **Goals**:
  - Standardize EVM modifications for Polkadot.
  - Ensure transparency in tool development and maintenance.
  - Create an inclusive roadmap for EVM development.
  - Provide expert opinions and reviews.
- **Membership**:
  - Two ranks: Junior and Senior members.
  - Roles define responsibilities and benefits.
- **Inactivity Check**: Members must be rated active by at least 1/3 of others every 6 months.
- **Salary and Treasury**: Managed through Polkadot referendums.
- **Discussions**:
  - Prefers small, specific collectives over a large one.
  - Uses a flat ranking system for practicality in decision-making.

WHO: Polkadot EVM Collective
WHAT: On-chain technical collective for EVM standardization, development and maintenance, creating an inclusive roadmap, and providing expert opinions
PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: Salary and sub-treasury system for future use with values set to 0, any increase or funding only done through Polkadot referendums. Inactivity check utilized to ensure active members, with ranks and roles defining voting power and responsibilities. Seeding members subject to final vote of a root referendum. Small collectives deemed more effective for carrying out tasks. Flat ranking system with two ranks and separate concept of roles to define responsibilities.

Approve the Polkadot EVM Collective

- **Root Track**: Should not allow delegations as it can completely change the protocol.
- **Wish for Change Track**: Should not allow delegations as it can produce deep changes in the protocol.
- **Treasurer Track**: Should not allow delegations due to unlimited spending potential, which could risk the entire treasury.
- **Delegation Concept**: Good for specific actions but risky for extreme importance due to the agent problem.
- **Daily Life Analogy**: Similar to not delegating for critical life events like marriage or divorce.
- **Critical Events**: Certain actions are too important to delegate, ensuring the owner's direct control.
- **Not Targeted at DV**: This proposal is about general delegation rules, not specifically aimed at any individual or group.
- **System Integrity**: Protecting the integrity of the system by limiting delegations in certain critical tracks.

Rejected

Proposal: Do not allow delegations on vital tracks (root, wish for change, treasurer) to protect system integrity. Delegation is good but risky for extreme importance. No specific target. No price/timeframe/resources mentioned.

Restrict delegations on root and treasurer tracks

root

whitelisted_caller

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

big_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Referenda Wish For Change

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

[2] Origin: WishForChange