Origin able to spend around 1,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

big_tipper

- This is a request to get back 1100 DOT that has been locked in three proposals. 
- The requests to refuse these proposals have been made.
- There are 100 DOT in one proposal and 1000 DOT in two others.
- The proposals are found on Polkadot's website.
- This request was combined into one before, but now they are separate.
- The action follows advice from a company called Parity.
- It’s just a refund, not a request for new money.
- The team is open to questions from the community.

Executed

WHO: The proposal is made by a group seeking reimbursement of their locked DOT deposits in Gov 1 Treasury proposals.

WHAT: The proposal aims to recover 1000 DOT locked in two Gov 1 Treasury proposals.

PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: No specific price or timeframe mentioned. No new funds requested, only a refund of existing funds.

Part 2 of 2 request for 1100 DOT deposit reimbursement

- Claudio is a Polkadot Ambassador and runs the KryptosChain media brand.
- He started creating content about Web3 in 2018 and has been covering the Polkadot ecosystem since its launch in 2020.
- Claudio previously made a proposal to grow a Romanian Polkadot community, which succeeded and was completed.
- He is now asking for funding to make 25 videos in 2 months, covering various Polkadot topics.
- The topics include comparisons with Cosmos, ecosystem news, governance updates, and interviews.
- The funding request is for about 932.45 DOT, valued at approximately $4,625.
- He promises to return any extra DOT if the price increases after the funding is received.

Polkadot Ambassador Claudio is proposing to produce 25 videos over 2 months, including comparison videos, ecosystem news, open governance news, and interviews with founders. The requested amount is 932.45 DOT, worth approximately $4,625 at today's market price.

(Big Tipper) Small Funding for KryptosChain Media

Requesting a return of the submission deposit

**Motion 377 Summary**

- Motion 377 aimed to fund the development of a cross-platform tip-as-you-go feature by Anagolay.
- The goal was to support verified creators and builders.
- The motion did not receive enough votes from the Council.
- The team decided not to pursue Treasury funding for now.
- They are focusing on other ways to achieve their goals.
- The team is requesting the return of a 500 DOTS deposit for a previous proposal.
- The project is self-funded and grassroots, so recovering the deposit would help.

WHO: Anagolay team
WHAT: Return 500 DOTS deposit for proposal #256
PRICE/TIMEFRAME/RESOURCES: Not specified

Returning submission deposit for Anagolay proposal, related to rejecting proposal #256 (more info in the desc.)

Requesting a return of the submission deposit related to Motion #405.

[OpenGov] Return of the bond for the rejection of (Gov1) Treasury Proposal #244 (MVP Workshop)

Requesting a return of the submission deposit related to Motion #406.

root

whitelisted_caller

wish_for_change

staking_admin

treasurer

lease_admin

fellowship_admin

general_admin

auction_admin

referendum_canceller

referendum_killer

small_tipper

small_spender

medium_spender

big_spender

Referenda Big Tipper

Origin able to dispatch a whitelisted call.

Origin for signaling that the network wishes for some change

Origin able to cancel slashes and manage minimum commission.

Origin for spending up to 10,000,000 DOT from the treasury as well as generally administering it.

Origin for managing the composition of the fellowship.

Origin able to spend around 250 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 10,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend around 100,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

Origin able to spend up to 1,000,000 DOT from the treasury at once.

[31] Origin: BigTipper